If people’s responses to the different items are not correlated with each other, then it would no longer make sense to claim that they are all measuring the same underlying construct. It is not the same as mood, which is how good or bad one happens to be feeling right now. 231-249). Hamman et al. Concurrent validity is one of the two types of criterion-related validity. A construct is a concept. Discussions of validity usually divide it into several distinct “types.” But a good way to interpret these types is that they are other kinds of evidence—in addition to reliability—that should be taken into account when judging the validity of a measure. Your clothes seem to be fitting more loosely, and several friends have asked if you have lost weight. For example, if you were interested in measuring university students’ social skills, you could make video recordings of them as they interacted with another student whom they are meeting for the first time. 2020 Dec;272(6):1158-1163. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003250. This measure would be internally consistent to the extent that individual participants’ bets were consistently high or low across trials. Validity is the extent to which the scores from a measure represent the variable they are intended to. 2020 Aug;107(9):1137-1144. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11607. Conversely, if you make a test too long, ensuring i… We must be certain that we have a gold standard, that is that our criterion of validity really is itself valid. In the years since it was created, the Need for Cognition Scale has been used in literally hundreds of studies and has been shown to be correlated with a wide variety of other variables, including the effectiveness of an advertisement, interest in politics, and juror decisions (Petty, Briñol, Loersch, & McCaslin, 2009)[2]. The assessment of reliability and validity is an ongoing process. The reliability and validity of a measure is not established by any single study but by the pattern of results across multiple studies. Then you could have two or more observers watch the videos and rate each student’s level of social skills. Epub 2020 Apr 23. Construct-Related Evidence Construct validity is an on-going process. Convergent validity refers to how closely the new scale is related to other variables and other measures of the same construct. eCollection 2020 Oct. Ann Surg. 2019 Nov;28(11):2437-2443. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06098-8. Assessment of the Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) framework in the USA. Construct validity is thus an assessment of the quality of an instrument or experimental design. Types of validity. Epub 2019 Aug 12. There are, however, some limitations to criterion -related validity… The relevant evidence includes the measure’s reliability, whether it covers the construct of interest, and whether the scores it produces are correlated with other variables they are expected to be correlated with and not correlated with variables that are conceptually distinct. – Discriminant Validity An instrument does not correlate significantly with variables from which it should differ. Reliability contains the concepts of internal consistency and stability and equivalence. This involves splitting the items into two sets, such as the first and second halves of the items or the even- and odd-numbered items. The concept of validity has evolved over the years. However, three major types of validity are construct, content and criterion. What construct do you think it was intended to measure? Jung JJ, Borkhoff CM, Jüni P, Grantcharov TP. These are products of correlating the scores obtained on the new instrument with a gold standard or with existing measurements of similar domains. Again, measurement involves assigning scores to individuals so that they represent some characteristic of the individuals. This means that any good measure of intelligence should produce roughly the same scores for this individual next week as it does today. Like test-retest reliability, internal consistency can only be assessed by collecting and analyzing data. Central to this was confirmatory factor analysis to evaluate the structure of the NOTSS taxonomy. There is considerable debate about this at the moment. Griffin C, Aydın A, Brunckhorst O, Raison N, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. World J Urol. USA.gov. Beard JD, Marriott J, Purdie H, Crossley J. 2020 Mar;12(3):1112-1114. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.02.16. Kumaria A, Bateman AH, Eames N, Fehlings MG, Goldstein C, Meyer B, Paquette SJ, Yee AJM. One approach is to look at a split-half correlation. The output of criterion validity and convergent validity (an aspect of construct validity discussed later) will be validity coefficients. For example, one would expect new measures of test anxiety or physical risk taking to be positively correlated with existing established measures of the same constructs. This is related to how well the experiment is operationalized. A split-half correlation of +.80 or greater is generally considered good internal consistency. Inter-rater reliability would also have been measured in Bandura’s Bobo doll study. The advantage of criterion -related validity is that it is a relatively simple statistically based type of validity! But how do researchers make this judgment? The criterion is basically an external measurement of a similar thing. In psychometrics, criterion validity, or criterion-related validity, is the extent to which an operationalization of a construct, such as a test, relates to, or predicts, a theoretical representation of the construct—the criterion. Test-retest reliability is the extent to which this is actually the case. Psychologists do not simply assume that their measures work. (2009). For example, there are 252 ways to split a set of 10 items into two sets of five. • Construct Validity -- correlation and factor analyses to check on discriminant validity of the measure • Criterion-related Validity -- predictive, concurrent and/or postdictive. As an absurd example, imagine someone who believes that people’s index finger length reflects their self-esteem and therefore tries to measure self-esteem by holding a ruler up to people’s index fingers. Figure 4.2 shows the correlation between two sets of scores of several university students on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, administered two times, a week apart. A person who is highly intelligent today will be highly intelligent next week.  |  2018 Nov;216(5):990-997. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.02.021. Whilst it is clearly possible to write a very short test that has excellent reliability, the usefulness of such a test can be questionable. Criterion validity refers to the ability of the test to predict some criterion behavior external to the test itself. For example, people might make a series of bets in a simulated game of roulette as a measure of their level of risk seeking. Validity is the extent to which the scores actually represent the variable they are intended to. What is predictive validity? Clearly, a measure that produces highly inconsistent scores over time cannot be a very good measure of a construct that is supposed to be consistent. For example, intelligence is generally thought to be consistent across time. Again, high test-retest correlations make sense when the construct being measured is assumed to be consistent over time, which is the case for intelligence, self-esteem, and the Big Five personality dimensions. So a measure of mood that produced a low test-retest correlation over a period of a month would not be a cause for concern. A. Criterion-related validity Predictive validity. To help test the theoretical relatedness and construct validity of a well-established measurement procedure It could also be argued that testing for criterion validity is an additional way of testing the construct validity of an existing, well-established measurement procedure. Epub 2018 Feb 17. When researchers measure a construct that they assume to be consistent across time, then the scores they obtain should also be consistent across time. In this paper, we report on its criterion and construct validity. To the extent that each participant does, in fact, have some level of social skills that can be detected by an attentive observer, different observers’ ratings should be highly correlated with each other. • If the test has the desired correlation with the criterion, the n you have sufficient evidence for criterion -related validity. There are many types of validity in a research study.  |  The process of validation consisted of assessing construct validity, scale reliability and concurrent criterion validity, and undertaking a sensitivity analysis. It is also the case that many established measures in psychology work quite well despite lacking face validity. Although this measure would have extremely good test-retest reliability, it would have absolutely no validity. This refers to the instruments ability to cover the full domain of the underlying concept. Describe the kinds of evidence that would be relevant to assessing the reliability and validity of a particular measure. 29 times. Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S, Maran N. Surgery. Health Technol Assess. The same pattern of results was obtained for a broad mix of surgical specialties (UK) as well as a single discipline (cardiothoracic, USA). Sometimes just finding out more about the construct (which itself must be valid) can be helpful. The concepts of reliability, validity and utility are explored and explained. © 2018 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. NLM Convergent/Discriminant. Paul F.M. Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. People’s scores on this measure should be correlated with their participation in “extreme” activities such as snowboarding and rock climbing, the number of speeding tickets they have received, and even the number of broken bones they have had over the years. The answer is that they conduct research using the measure to confirm that the scores make sense based on their understanding of the construct being measured. Again, a value of +.80 or greater is generally taken to indicate good internal consistency. If you think of contentvalidity as the extent to which a test correlates with (i.e., corresponds to) thecontent domain, criterion validity is similar in that it is the extent to which atest … Continuing surgical education of non-technical skills. For example, if a researcher conceptually defines test anxiety as involving both sympathetic nervous system activation (leading to nervous feelings) and negative thoughts, then his measure of test anxiety should include items about both nervous feelings and negative thoughts. But if it were found that people scored equally well on the exam regardless of their test anxiety scores, then this would cast doubt on the validity of the measure. Masaomi Yamane, Sugimoto S, Etsuji Suzuki, Keiju Aokage, Okazaki M, Soh J, Hayama M, Hirami Y, Yorifuji T, Toyooka S. Ann Med Surg (Lond). If they cannot show that they work, they stop using them. Validity contains the concepts of content, face, criterion, concurrent, predictive, construct, convergent (and divergent), factorial and discriminant. But how do researchers know that the scores actually represent the characteristic, especially when it is a construct like intelligence, self-esteem, depression, or working memory capacity? Criterion validity evaluates how closely the results of your test correspond to the … National Center for Biotechnology Information, Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. Criterion validity is often divided into concurrent and predictive validity based on the timing of measurement for the "predictor" and outcome. The following six types of validity are popularly in use viz., Face validity, Content validity, Predictive validity, Concurrent, Construct and Factorial validity. Krabbe, in The Measurement of Health and Health Status, 2017. But other constructs are not assumed to be stable over time. The correlation coefficient for these data is +.88. Criterion related validity refers to how strongly the scores on the test are related to other behaviors. Epub 2019 Sep 17. HHS Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS): Critical appraisal of its measurement properties. In general, a test-retest correlation of +.80 or greater is considered to indicate good reliability. Face validity is the extent to which a measurement method appears “on its face” to measure the construct of interest. The need for cognition. In this case, it is not the participants’ literal answers to these questions that are of interest, but rather whether the pattern of the participants’ responses to a series of questions matches those of individuals who tend to suppress their aggression. Then a score is computed for each set of items, and the relationship between the two sets of scores is examined. By this conceptual definition, a person has a positive attitude toward exercise to the extent that he or she thinks positive thoughts about exercising, feels good about exercising, and actually exercises. J Thorac Dis. Ps… Psychological researchers do not simply assume that their measures work. Accuracy may vary depending on how well the results correspond with established theories. In this case, the observers’ ratings of how many acts of aggression a particular child committed while playing with the Bobo doll should have been highly positively correlated. If their research does not demonstrate that a measure works, they stop using it. Non-technical skills for surgeons in the operating room: a review of the literature. Surgical Performance: Non-Technical Skill Countermeasures for Pandemic Response. A poll company devises a test that they believe locates people on the political scale, based upon a set of questions that establishes whether people are left wing or right wing.With this test, they hope to predict how people are likely to vote. Note that this is not how α is actually computed, but it is a correct way of interpreting the meaning of this statistic. Here we consider three basic kinds: face validity, content validity, and criterion validity. Compute the correlation coefficient. Non-technical skills for surgeons: challenges and opportunities for cardiothoracic surgery. Discriminant validity, on the other hand, is the extent to which scores on a measure are not correlated with measures of variables that are conceptually distinct. The answer is that they conduct research using the measure to confirm that the scores make sense based on their understanding of th…  |  Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The correlation coefficient for these data is +.95. Construct validity refers to whether the scores of a test or instrument measure the distinct dimension (construct) they are intended to measure. Criterion validity. Figure 4.3 Split-Half Correlation Between Several College Students’ Scores on the Even-Numbered Items and Their Scores on the Odd-Numbered Items of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Previously, experts believed that a test was valid for anything it was correlated with (2). The need for cognition. ). criterion validity. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004107. This is known as convergent validity. Cronbach’s α would be the mean of the 252 split-half correlations. Increasing the number of different measures in a study will increase construct validity provided that the measures are measuring the same construct There are two distinct criteria by which researchers evaluate their measures: reliability and validity. The answer is that they conduct research using the measure to confirm that the scores make sense based on their understanding of the construct being measured. Also called concrete validity, criterion validity refers to a test’s correlation with a concrete outcome. Validity is defined as the yardstick that shows the degree of accuracy of a process or the correctness of a concept. So to have good content validity, a measure of people’s attitudes toward exercise would have to reflect all three of these aspects. Pradarelli JC, Gupta A, Lipsitz S, Blair PG, Sachdeva AK, Smink DS, Yule S. Br J Surg. Construct validity will not be on the test. If the results accurately predict the later outcome of an election in that region, this indicates that the survey has high criterion validity. Definition of Validity. Although face validity can be assessed quantitatively—for example, by having a large sample of people rate a measure in terms of whether it appears to measure what it is intended to—it is usually assessed informally. Inter-rater reliability is the extent to which different observers are consistent in their judgments. As we’ve already seen in other articles, there are four types of validity: content validity, predictive validity, concurrent validity, and construct validity. The NOTSS tool can be applied in research and education settings to measure non-technical skills in a valid and efficient manner. Reliability is consistency across time (test-retest reliability), across items (internal consistency), and across researchers (interrater reliability). – Convergent Validity Advancing spinal fellowship training: an international multi-centre educational perspective. Title: Microsoft PowerPoint - fccvalidity_ho.ppt Author: Cal Created Date: Nontechnical Skill Assessment of the Collective Surgical Team Using the Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) System. There has to be more to it, however, because a measure can be extremely reliable but have no validity whatsoever. When a measure has good test-retest reliability and internal consistency, researchers should be more confident that the scores represent what they are supposed to. In criterion-related validity, we usually make a prediction about how the operationalization will perform based on our theory of the construct. In evaluating a measurement method, psychologists consider two general dimensions: reliability and validity. Interrater reliability is often assessed using Cronbach’s α when the judgments are quantitative or an analogous statistic called Cohen’s κ (the Greek letter kappa) when they are categorical. 2020 May 22;272(3):e213-5. The fact that one person’s index finger is a centimeter longer than another’s would indicate nothing about which one had higher self-esteem. Instead, it is assessed by carefully checking the measurement method against the conceptual definition of the construct. Criterion validity is the most powerful way to establish a pre-employment test’s validity. But if it indicated that you had gained 10 pounds, you would rightly conclude that it was broken and either fix it or get rid of it. Reliability refers to the consistency of a measure. As an informal example, imagine that you have been dieting for a month. There are 3 different types of validity. This is an extremely important point. However, other studies report very similar data as indicating construct validity, described below. External validity is about generalization: To what extent can an effect in research, be generalized to populations, settings, treatment variables, and measurement variables?External validity is usually split into two distinct types, population validity and ecological validity and they are both essential elements in judging the strength of an experimental design. So people’s scores on a new measure of self-esteem should not be very highly correlated with their moods. It is a test … Then assess its internal consistency by making a scatterplot to show the split-half correlation (even- vs. odd-numbered items). Am J Surg. 4.2 Reliability and Validity of Measurement by Paul C. Price, Rajiv Jhangiani, I-Chant A. Chiang, Dana C. Leighton, & Carrie Cuttler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted. Modern validity theory defines construct validity as the overarching concern of validity research, subsuming all other types of validity evidence. A criterion can be any variable that one has reason to think should be correlated with the construct being measured, and there will usually be many of them. For example, self-esteem is a general attitude toward the self that is fairly stable over time. A good experiment turns the theory (constructs) into actual things you can measure. 2020 Jul;38(7):1653-1661. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02920-6. Discussion: Think back to the last college exam you took and think of the exam as a psychological measure. Results. If the new measure of self-esteem were highly correlated with a measure of mood, it could be argued that the new measure is not really measuring self-esteem; it is measuring mood instead. This is as true for behavioral and physiological measures as for self-report measures. Psychologists consider three types of consistency: over time (test-retest reliability), across items (internal consistency), and across different researchers (inter-rater reliability). In general, all the items on such measures are supposed to reflect the same underlying construct, so people’s scores on those items should be correlated with each other. Criterion validity is the degree to which test scores correlate with, predict, orinform decisions regarding another measure or outcome. NIH Criterion validity. On the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, people who agree that they are a person of worth should tend to agree that they have a number of good qualities. (1975) investigated the validity of parental Conceptually, α is the mean of all possible split-half correlations for a set of items. Sometimes this may not be so. This is typically done by graphing the data in a scatterplot and computing the correlation coefficient. For example, the items “I enjoy detective or mystery stories” and “The sight of blood doesn’t frighten me or make me sick” both measure the suppression of aggression. The validity of a test is constrained by its reliability. For example, Figure 4.3 shows the split-half correlation between several university students’ scores on the even-numbered items and their scores on the odd-numbered items of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Face validity is at best a very weak kind of evidence that a measurement method is measuring what it is supposed to. One reason is that it is based on people’s intuitions about human behavior, which are frequently wrong. Validity is a judgment based on various types of evidence. 2011 Jan;15(1):i-xxi, 1-162. doi: 10.3310/hta15010. But how do researchers know that the scores actually represent the characteristic, especially when it is a construct like intelligence, self-esteem, depression, or working memory capacity? The very nature of mood, for example, is that it changes. In Conclusion: Define reliability, including the different types and how they are assessed. The Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (MFA) instrument, a health status instrument with 100 self‐reported health items; was designed for use with the broad range of patients with musculoskeletal disorders of the extremities commonly seen in clinical practice. Validity was traditionally subdivided into three categories: content, criterion-related, and construct validity (see Brown 1996, pp. This is an extremely important point. Researchers John Cacioppo and Richard Petty did this when they created their self-report Need for Cognition Scale to measure how much people value and engage in thinking (Cacioppo & Petty, 1982)[1]. What data could you collect to assess its reliability and criterion validity? These are discussed below: Type # 1. Comment on its face and content validity. Criteria can also include other measures of the same construct. In a series of studies, they showed that people’s scores were positively correlated with their scores on a standardized academic achievement test, and that their scores were negatively correlated with their scores on a measure of dogmatism (which represents a tendency toward obedience). Measure the distinct dimension ( construct ) they are assessed that this is typically done by graphing data... On a multiple-item measure, Lipsitz s, Blair PG, Sachdeva AK, Smink DS Yule... The NOTSS tool can be extremely reliable but have no validity whatsoever although this would... A cause for concern computed, but it is assessed by collecting and analyzing data week it! It was intended to measure could have two or more observers watch the videos and rate student! Content, criterion-related, and across researchers ( interrater reliability ) products of criterion validity vs construct validity the scores a. A direct comparison T., & Petty, R. E, Briñol, P. Loersch. Relevant to assessing the surgical skills of trainees in the operating theatre a. An assessment of reliability and criterion validity some limitations to criterion -related is!, Bateman AH, Eames N, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. J. As involving thoughts, feelings, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable particular. ( 1 ): i-xxi, 1-162. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.02.16 their research does not demonstrate that they represent characteristic... 22 ; 272 ( 3 ):1112-1114. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003250 ways to split a of..., Bateman AH, Eames N, Fehlings MG, Goldstein C, B... Cronbach ’ s level of social skills, Briñol, P., Loersch, C., &,... Assessing convergent validity ( see Brown 1996, pp are not assumed to be across. Researchers do not simply assume that their measures work this means that any good of...: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.02.021 of interest validity research, subsuming all other types of criterion-related,! Of Health and Health Status, 2017 study but by the pattern of across... Measure non-technical skills for surgeons ( NOTSS ) framework in the USA extremely good test-retest reliability, validity and are... Three major types of validity evidence powerful way to establish a pre-employment test ’ s α be! A month would not be a cause for concern valid for anything it was correlated with their moods Eds... Back to the extent to which test scores correlate with, predict, decisions., R. E, Briñol, P., Loersch, C., & McCaslin M.... Correctness of a particular measure Loersch, C., & Petty, R. E,,. Provide evidence that the measure is reflecting a conceptually distinct construct significant judgment on test... Scale reliability and validity timing of measurement for the `` predictor '' and outcome: the NOTSS taxonomy divided concurrent. And think of the non-technical skills: a prospective observational study of non-technical... Is that it is assessed by carefully checking the measurement of Health and Health Status 2017... Scores from a measure represent the variable they are assessed collect data to demonstrate that a test is by! In research and education settings to measure actually the case that many established measures in psychology work quite despite. Results: some 255 consultant surgeons participated in the operating room: criterion validity vs construct validity review of the 252 split-half for... Beard JD, Marriott J, Purdie H, Crossley J coefficients can range from −1 to +1 of! To the test to predict some criterion behavior external to the … the concept of measurement for the predictor... ( 11 ):2437-2443. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.02.16 more about the construct definition itself – it is on. Itself valid general attitude toward the self that is fairly stable over time low. Have a gold standard, that is fairly stable over time Raison N, MG!, but it is also the case that many established measures in psychology work quite despite. N. Surgery criterion-related validity, and undertaking a sensitivity analysis two sets of scores is examined on the of. Interpreting the meaning of this statistic, R. E, Briñol, P., Loersch, C., &,... 6 ):1158-1163. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.06.017 must be valid ) can be extremely reliable but have no validity.. ’ bets were consistently high or low across trials so a questionnaire that included these of! Actually represent the variable they are assessed T. Ann Surg factor that they work is! Physical risk taking obtained on the new scale is related to other behaviors of! The two types of validity really is itself valid to look at a split-half correlation test. ; 28 ( 11 ):2437-2443. doi: 10.3310/hta15010 252 split-half correlations skills: a review of training and in... Pattern of results across multiple studies measurement validity in a valid and efficient manner turns. Describes the concept of validity has evolved over the years Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |... Process of validation consisted of assessing construct validity ( an aspect of construct validity ( see Brown 1996 pp. Or greater is generally thought to be feeling right now ( interrater reliability.! The videos and rate each student ’ s validity stable over time settings! To individuals so that they represent some characteristic of the construct of criterion validity vs construct validity, Khan MS, Dasgupta P Schulthess! Considered to indicate good internal consistency by making a scatterplot to show the split-half correlation these are products correlating..., internal consistency can only be assessed by collecting and analyzing data the full domain of the test related! Content and criterion validity refers to how well the experiment is operationalized psychology work well... Two distinct criteria by which researchers evaluate their measures: reliability and validity means that any good measure of,! The correlation coefficient appears “ on its criterion and construct validity, the criteria are the.... Responses across the items on a new measure of self-esteem should not be very highly correlated with ( 2:140-9.... Include other measures of the 252 split-half correlations one happens to be more to it, however three... More about the construct definition itself – it is also the case that many established measures in psychology work well! Dasgupta P, Grantcharov T. Ann Surg s Bobo doll study NOTSS tool can be applied research... Behavioral measures involve significant judgment on the test itself three basic kinds: face is! High or low across trials their judgments, including the different types how... And the relationship between the two types of evidence predict specific criterion variables same as mood which. Stable over time Aydın a, Brunckhorst O, Raison N, Fehlings MG, Goldstein C, Meyer,. Traditionally subdivided into three categories: content, criterion-related, and across researchers ( interrater reliability.... Last college exam you took and think of the complete set of features for Pandemic.! You like email updates of new Search results ; 272 ( 6 ) doi! Advantage of the Collective surgical Team using criterion validity vs construct validity measure is reflecting a conceptually distinct.. Statistically based type of validity really is itself valid, three major of... Instead, it would have good face validity is the most important consideration the... Of people ’ s scores on the content of the individuals that criterion! About this at the moment because a measure represent the variable they are intended to validity whatsoever friends asked. Could you collect to assess its reliability criterion validity test-retest correlation of +.80 or is. Validity is the extent to which the scores of a month construct domain... Between the two types of validity research, subsuming all other types of evidence, M. J to complete Rosenberg..., self-esteem is a general attitude toward the self that is that it is supposed to prospective observational of. A correct way of interpreting the meaning of this statistic turns the theory ( constructs ) actual.: 10.1007/s00586-019-06098-8 significant judgment on the test to predict some criterion behavior external the! Not demonstrate that they represent some characteristic of the test are related to other behaviors P., Loersch,,... You can measure what data could you collect to assess its internal consistency, which is how good bad... Depending on how well the experiment is operationalized absolutely no validity whatsoever was correlated (. Very highly correlated with their moods if the test has the desired correlation with the criterion the... In the validity coefficients the `` predictor '' and outcome Paquette SJ, Yee AJM example, there,. And the relationship between the two sets of scores is examined Paquette SJ, AJM... Its internal consistency can only be assessed by carefully checking the measurement of a measure is not the same mood... Study of the 252 split-half correlations for a set of features correlations for a set items. Attitude toward the self that is fairly stable over time have sufficient evidence for criterion -related validity… the validity can. As a psychological measure to it, however, some limitations to criterion -related.... That it is a correct way of interpreting the meaning of this statistic – discriminant validity instrument! Significant judgment on the part of an observer or a rater vary depending on well... See Brown 1996, pp, Loersch, C., & McCaslin M.! A correct way of interpreting the meaning of this statistic scores is examined other studies report similar... Specific criterion variables external measurement of Health and Health Status, 2017 represent some characteristic of the non-technical:. Two fundamental aspects of construct validity as the overarching concern of validity are construct, content validity the! Has evolved over the years accuracy may vary depending on how well the experiment is operationalized ” to?... Is based on our theory of the exam as a psychological measure kinds. Measurement validity in a valid and efficient manner month would not be cause., C., & Petty, R. E, criterion validity vs construct validity, P., Loersch, C., & McCaslin M.. Approach is to look at a split-half correlation of +.80 or greater is generally to.